- Betting Life Newsletter
- Posts
- š Die Hard Is a Christmas Movie
š Die Hard Is a Christmas Movie
'Twas the NFL Sunday beforeā¦
If youāre not double-screening Die Hard and NFL games today, youāre not John McClaneās type of Americanā¦
In todayās Betting Life newsletter:
Christmas Movies: The definitive top 10.
Player Props! The most disgusting bet ever?
Power Rank: Regression on the horizon?
A Group Chat Parlay: +515 for the degeneratesā¦
SNF: Broncos. Patriots. Gold. Frankincense. Myrrh.
Itās 12/24: Take it away, Matthew Freedmanā¦
If thereās one thing people care about most this time of year ā other than football ā itās debating Christmas movies.
Hereās my objectively subjective top 10 list of all-time Christmas movies. (Donāt worry, weāve still got loads of football content, per usual.)
š« Dishonorable Mention: Itās a Wonderful Life
One of the most depressing movies ever written. Such a painful watch.
ā¤ļø No. 10: Love, Actually
Alan Rickman + Christmas = Top 10.
āØ No. 9: Any Harry Potter Movie
Thereās a lot of Christmas in the Harry Potter story, and any of the Harry Potter movie will do (except maybe the first two).
And, again, Alan Rickman + Christmas = Top 10.
š¶ No. 8: Muppet Christmas Carol
Itās classic ā and itās virtuously short.
š No. 7: National Lampoonās Christmas Vacation
On the one hand, this movie is probably the best of the National Lampoonās Vacation series. On the other handā¦ that entire series is overrated?
I just canāt put this in the top five. Itās not that funny of a movie. But it gets into the top 10 based on reputation.
š¼ No. 6: Batman Returns
I might catch some heat for this one, but I donāt care. Itās a Tim Burton movie set at Christmas time ā and it has Michelle Pfeiffer in that Catwoman suit.
š” No. 5: Home Alone
Itās gotta be in the top five. And the supporting cast of Joe Pesci, Daniel Stern, John Heard, Catherine OāHara, and John Candy is amazing.
š„ No. 4: Mixed Nuts
Youāve maybe never heard of this one. Itās weird.
But itās written and directed by Nora Ephron, and it has one of the best casts a 1994 movie could have: Steve Martin, Liev Schreiber, Adam Sandler, Steven Wright, Garry Shandling, Jon Stewart, Rob Reiner, Madeline Kahn, Juliette Lewis, Rita Wilson, and Parker Posey.
š No. 3: Elf
Will Ferrellās masterpiece: This is the movie heāll be remembered for 100 years from now.
š No. 2: Bad Santa
Drunk Billy Bob Thornton and peak Lauren Graham. This one definitely isnāt for the kids ā but it goes perfectly with rummy eggnog.
š¤ No. 1: Die Hard
Alan Rickman + Christmas = Top 10.
Yippee ki-yay.
For everything you need for Week 16 ā including our inactives page, which will update shortly after 11:30 am ET with all of the relevant status updates ā you can get to your destination with a mere click of a button.
See our suite of tools to get you ready for todayās slate below:
Every week, Matthew Freedman writes an article with five of his favorite player props. Here are a couple of them, which you can find (along with lots of other bets) in our 100% FREE bet tracker.
My Projection: -122.1
Cutoff: -120
Thereās not much difference between my projection and the best line available in this market, but I still love Mostert to find the endzone this week.
At -110, Mostert has an implied probability of 52.4% to score a TD in this game, but I have his true probability at 55.0% (per our Fantasy Life Odds Calculator) ā- and I believe Iām probably too low on him.
Dolphins-Cowboys easily has the weekās highest total at 49.5, so we could see a lot of points put up in this game.
The Dolphins are home favorites, so they could have more of a run-leaning game script than usual ā especially since the Cowboys are No. 32 in defensive rush success rate (45.3%, per RBs Donāt Matter).
Mostert leads the league with 20 TDs and has scored in 11 of 14 games (78.6%). In the five games since the Week 10 bye, he has seven TDs.
Heās one of my Week 16 fantasy favorites, and given what we saw last week out of James Cook against the Cowboys (25-179-1 rushing, 2-42-1 receiving), itās hard to imagine Mostert not having success this week.
My Projection: 15.9
Cutoff: 13.5
Iāve made some disgusting bets this year.
This one might be the most disgusting.
But Raymond has gone over this number in 11 of 14 games, and he has an average of 10.2 yards per target this year and 9.9 since last year.
Basically, Iām hoping that Raymond has two-plus targets. In his ten games with that volume, he has gone over this number nine times. And even with just one target, this bet still has a chance to cash on account of Raymondās playmaking efficiency: In three games with a lone target, he has gone over 11.5 yards twice.
This is a buy-low spot in the market: 11.5 is the lowest Raymondās yardage prop has been over the past two years.
Raymond is just a part-time role player, but he still had a 31% route rate last week, and since the Week 9 bye he has a 22% target rate (per our Fantasy Life Utilization Report).
Asking for at least two targets is not a lot.
And, now, a very important and earnest message from all of us here at Fantasy Life to all of you.
Merry Christmas, you filthy animals.
Ed Feng is the proprietor of The Power Rank. This season, heās 41-26 (+24.9 units) on INT Props. Hereās one of his INT bets for Week 16.
In 2022, Dak Prescott had a massive turnover problem. The Dallas QB threw 17 INTs, and the last two came in a playoff loss at San Francisco.
Everything has changed in 2023, as Prescott has seven INTs. However, the underlying metrics tell a different story.
My research has shown the utility of looking at bad ball rate, or INTs and passes defended per pass attempt, in predicting future INTs. The more often a QB puts the ball in a dangerous position, the more likely he throws a pick.
Here are Prescottās numbers for the past two seasons (NFL average bad ball rate of 11.7% and INT rate of 2.3%):
2022: 13.1% bad ball rate, 3.7% INT rate
2023: 13.6% bad ball rate, 1.4% INT rate
Dallas has gotten lucky with INTs this year. My model gives a 59% chance he throws a pick against Miami, and there is value in Prescott over 0.5 INTs (-130, DraftKings).
š Looking sharp isnāt just about how you dress. Where sharps are betting for Week 16.
š¤ In the āVegas knowsā category of coincidences: James Cook, 70 yards, pain.
š Brock = Garoppolo? No, not really.
āļø QB values, ATS picks, and more. Freedmanās best bets for Week 16.
šļø The NFLās concussion protocol: āThe code is more what youād call āguidelinesā than actual rules.ā
š° Need more plays? That was rhetorical. We know you need more plays. And we have them (for FREE).
š Projections vs prop lines. There once was a bus named āGus.ā
š“āā ļø The best Pickāem plays for Week 16. Lower your love for Love?
š¤ Money well spent? I watched this video, and now I have Raoās Homemade in the house.
š„§ āYou donāt score, until you score.ā Touchdown bets for Week 16.
Welcome to Week 16 of Bets from the Group Chat, where I (Geoff Ulrich) elicit information from my Fantasy Life colleagues about their bets.
The group chat three-way parlay record moves to 5-6 on the year after we hit a +216 payout on our Week 15 card. The win means weāre up +17.7 units overall on these plays since we started (and the individual plays are 24-8-1, wow).
As always, we have three separate plays from three different sources for our parlay below.
ā¬ļø Freedman Likes: Gus Edwards Over 39.5 Rush Yards (-110, BetMGM)
Projection: 51.9
Play to: 42.5 (-110)
The Ravens lost Keaton Mitchell for the season last week and Edwards ā who went over this total in eight straight games at one point ā took 16 carries in the Ravensā last game.
The 49ers rank just 29th in defensive rush EPA as well and allowed 8.85 yards per carry to the Cardinals RBs last week. Love this one.
Projection: 39.7
Play to: 34.5 (-105)
Allgeierās yardage projection on Fantasy Life still shows a 6 to 7 yard edge to the over this week, which is pretty similar to the edge we had last week on him.
Given that Allgeier has taken no less than eight carries in each of his past 10 games, we need just average efficiency from him to hit this.
Projection: 1.9
Play to: 1.5 (-140) or over 20.5 receiving yards (-125)
The Vikings have allowed the fourth-fewest rushing yards to opposing RBs but have ceded the fourth-most receptions to opposing WRs.
Reynolds himself has played well of late and has averaged 3.5 targets over his past four games. For the season, heās also gone for two-plus receptions in 10 of 14 games.
š¤ Putting It All Together: +515 (BetMGM)
Edwards over 39.5 rush yards (-110)
Allgeier over 33.5 rush yards (-117)
Reynolds over 1.5 receptions (-133)
You can tail our group parlay at BetMGM, where you can get up to $1,500 paid back in bonus bets when you sign up for a new account below!
75+ Rec Yards (+155): Play to +150
80+ Rec Yards and Anytime TD: +400 SGP
100+ Rec Yards (+425): Play to +400
The Bears have had trouble defending against dynamic TEs like McBride. Last week they allowed David Njoku to go for a career-high 10 catches, and they have now allowed five TDs to TEs over their past seven games.
I don't trust Bears HC Matt Eberflus to make the proper adjustments for this game either, and with the Cardinals receiving core banged up, McBride seems destined to approach his ceiling in targets (heās averaged nine targets over his past five games).
For betting purposes, laddering up to 100+ yards makes sense, but given how poorly the Bears have defended against TEs I like including a same-game parlay that includes an anytime TD as well.
If youāre not busy watching your favorite Christmas movie on Sunday night ā I (this is Matt LaMarca, by the way) watch Die Hard with a nice glass of Baileyās every Christmas Eve ā there is a football game available for your viewing pleasure. Here are some of my favorite bets for Patriots-Broncos.
Iām not going out on a huge limb here ā I donāt think either of these offenses will be particularly effective. The Patriotsā futility has been well-documented, but the Broncos are just 25th in yards per game and 20th in EPA/play.
The Broncos have also been more efficient running than throwing, so the matchup vs. the Patriots is a bad one for them. Russell Wilson is going to need to make plays with his arm, and he simply isnāt the player he was in his prime.
The āprimetime undersā trend has lost some steam recently, but they remain extremely profitable overall. Unders in Sunday and Monday Night Football are a ridiculous 26-7 this season, and theyāre 109-61-3 over the past five years.
These two squads are a combined 11-17 to the under in 2023, and I see no reason why they canāt combine for another one on Sunday night.
Weāre not showing a ton of value with the over on Wilsonās rushing prop, but I think our projection is a bit conservative. One area where Wilson has looked more like the Seattle version of himself is with his legs. Heās had a designed run rate of at least 17% for four straight weeks, and heās had at least six carries in six of his past seven games. He hasnāt been particularly efficient in his past two, tallying just 11 total yards, but heās had eight games with at least 21 rushing yards so far this season.
With his volume continuing to increase, this seems like a prime positive regression spot. Wilsonās rushing prop is as high as 22.5 yards at other locations, so getting the over on 19.5 at FanDuel is a solid investment.
Under 35.5
Broncos -6.5
Wilson Over 19.5 rushing yards
Courtland Sutton anytime TD
Iām building this SGP on the premise that the Patriots canāt score. That seems like a pretty reasonable assumption based on what weāve seen for most of the season.
This starts with under 35.5 points, and Iām pairing that with the Broncos -6.5. Iām buying down under the key number of -7, giving us a smidge of added security.
After that, Iām adding in the over on Wilsonās rushing prop and an anytime TD for Sutton. Pairing an anytime TD with an under might not make the most sense, but that negative correlation increases the odds to +1436 ā thatās āpay for Christmasā level payouts. Somebody has to score the ball for the Broncos to cover the -6.5, and Iām banking on Sutton being that guy.